Sterile Aseptic Processing – Stepping into the Future

by Erik Freeman Rodgers, GxP Compliance Principal Consultant @PQE Group

Purpose: Demonstrate the advantage isolator sterile processing manufacturing has over restricted access barrier systems (RABS), and the need for biopharmaceutical sterile manufacturing facilities to obsolete their existing RABS equipment and replace with isolator units to have the capability to meet future heightened current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) aseptic processing standards.  

 Results: EU GMP Annex 2: Manufacture of Biological Medicinal Products for Human Use introduced new stage and substance sterile product bioburden requirements. This update combined with evolving regulations compels the need for aseptic manufacturing companies to obsolete their archaic RABS systems in order to prepare their sterile processing facilities for future compliance standards.   

Implications: The isolators design eliminates the need for human intervention during the manufacturing process.  RABS configuration limitations, renders it incapable of eliminating the manufacturing process human element regardless of how advanced the design.  Subsequently, Isolator sterile product manufacturing is much safer operationally and mitigates the risk of adverse events and or product adulteration that may occur during processing the end product.   

Methods: The primary sterile manufacturing design objective is to eliminate the biologic product exposure to potential contaminants during processing, where possible.  Currently, the RABS and isolators are the equipment of choice for fill finish biologic sterile formulation end products. Aseptic processing is a necessity in most circumstances because end product terminal sterilization applications are not feasible in most processes, due to the majority of sterile biologic products being heat intolerant. 

Chapters 2.6.1 of the European Pharmacopeia (EP) and 71 of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) detail the parenteral end and injectable medicinal products sterility test requirements.  To meet sterility specification manufacturing processes must limit product exposure duration to extraneous process elements.  This is achieved through adhering to the highest cleanroom and environmental control standards and removing human involvement during the aseptic manufacturing process wherever feasible. 

Sterile Aseptic Processing_Banner

The Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) guide and EU GMP Annex 1 Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products states sterile products are subject to special requirements and details the use of appropriate technologies, referencing RABS and isolators, as manufacturing necessities to ensure the protection of the product from probable particulate, pyrogen, and microbial contamination sourced from personnel, materials, and or the surrounding environment.   Unfortunately, the documents fail to differentiate the limitations between the two types of equipmentThe RABS design renders it impossible to eliminate human interaction during processingConsequently, its capacity to mitigate contamination sourced from the human element is less effective than isolators. While RABS can approach isolator like capability in their most advanced iteration, human intervention remains a necessity in its manufacturing processes despite the configurationRABS environmental control processing range from less evolved design, cleanroom capabilities, and expand to state of the art designs that meet sterility manufacturing specifications. However, the most advanced RABS configuration is still inferior to the isolator because the isolator provides absolute separation between the human element, sterile materials, and correlating processing events.   

EU GMP Annex 2 – Manufacture of Biological Active Substances and Medical Products for Human Use introduces additional bioburden level requirements for sterile processing materials The constant evolution of sterile processing requirements is an example of the ever evolving GMP requirements as technology advances. The limitations of the RABS design has put an expiration date on its usability as the equipment has exhausted its adaptability potential, and will not be able to meet the ever increasing aseptic processing regulatory expectationsIn the near future companies will be forced to obsolesce their legacy RABS capital and upgrade their facilities to meet the new sterile processing compliance and regulatory mandates.   Sterile processing equipment needs to be pliable and or advanced enough to be able to adapt to the ever evolving aseptic processing cGMP environment in order to placate the large capital expenditureSubsequently, it is imperative facilities transition all their sterile processing to the isolator closed system design, ensuring their equipment to be fit for use for many years to come.   

 

References

EU guidelines for Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products for Human and Veterinary Use Volume 4; Annex 2: Manufacture of Biological active substances and Medicinal Products for Human Use 

 Proceedings of the council for Pharmaceutical Excellence volume 1 June 2020; copyright 2020 James Agalloco and Russell Madsen  

Guidance for Industry: Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing Current Good Manufacturing Practice – September 2004 Pharmaceutical cGMPs    

 

 

Want to know more?

Our consultants can support you to achieve the full compliance of your products.

Visit our Quality Compliance dedicated page or get in touch with us to learn how PQE Group can help your business.

Contact us